Q 1. Carefully read the short argument on page F12 (Links to an external site.) a few times. NOTE: This argument is a great example of POOR USE OF THE FOUR APPEALS. I expect you to be very critical in explaining how and why the author, Louisa Young, went wrong. This is what I want you to practice--being critical. 2. In your first, post, select one question on page F13 from each of the four categories (Links to an external site.): emotional appeals, character appeals, values appeals, and logical appeals (This is four questions total.) 3. Answer your four selected questions in detail, analyzing the argument, "Men Should Have Better Things to Do". Your response should be at a minimum of 600 words total. (See the word count in the lower left.) 4. PLEASE DO NOT INCLUDE THE ANALYSIS QUESTIONS IN YOUR RESPONSE. 5. In your second post, respond to a colleague's observations. Select one that has given you new insight into one or more of the four appeals, and explain why in a minimum of 100 words. 6. See the word counter here to check your post length! I don't want you to lose points. When you're ready to begin, simply click on the "Reply" button in the bottom lower left.